How to Prevent Interview Coding Assignment Leaks
Learn how to protect interview coding assignments from being leaked online. Strategies for both companies and candidates using password-protected links, expiration times, and secure submission methods.
How to Prevent Interview Coding Assignment Leaks
Coding assignments are a core tool for evaluating candidates in technical interviews. But these assignments are increasingly being leaked online, creating a serious problem. A quick search on GitHub surfaces take-home assignments and model solutions from well-known companies.
The Reality of Assignment Leaks
The Company Side
- Reusing the same assignment means candidates can prepare answers in advance
- Replacing leaked assignments costs the engineering team time and resources
- Leaks mean interview outcomes are determined by information access, not ability
The Candidate Side
- Your submitted code could appear online, disadvantaging you in future interviews
- Posting assignment results on a public GitHub may violate an NDA
- There are cases where companies use submitted code without authorization
Assignment Protection Strategies for Companies
Distribute Assignments via Password-Protected Links
Instead of attaching assignments to emails or sharing via Google Docs, use password-protected links.
Workflow:
- Write the assignment brief as a secret memo
- Set a unique password for each candidate
- Set an expiration time (e.g., 72 hours)
- Send the link and password to the candidate through separate channels
Advantages:
| Traditional Method | Password-Protected Link |
|---|---|
| Email attachment -> can be forwarded endlessly | Cannot be viewed without password |
| Google Docs -> anyone with the link can access | Auto-deletes after expiration |
| Internal system -> complex infrastructure needed | No additional system required |
Create Unique Variations Per Candidate
Even with the same topic, giving each candidate a slightly different version allows you to trace the source if a leak occurs.
Candidate A: "Library Management System" + search feature
Candidate B: "Library Management System" + checkout feature
Candidate C: "Library Management System" + recommendation feature
Time-Limited Access
Restricting the viewing window makes it harder for candidates to seek external help.
| Assignment Type | Recommended Time Limit |
|---|---|
| Simple coding problem | 24 hours |
| Project-based assignment | 72 hours |
| System design problem | 48 hours |
| Code review assignment | 24 hours |
Submission Protection Strategies for Candidates
Do Not Post on Public GitHub
Posting interview assignments to a public GitHub repository causes multiple problems.
- It may violate the company's NDA
- Other candidates can copy your code
- The company may blacklist you
Use Private Repositories
If you want to keep a record of your work, always use a private repository.
# Create a private repository
gh repo create interview-task --private
# Or change an existing repo to private
gh repo edit --visibility private
Submit via Password-Protected Link
You can also use a secret memo when submitting your assignment to the company.
- Write the repository URL or submission notes in a secret memo
- Set a password
- Send the link and password separately to the interviewer
- Revoke repository access after the interview process ends
LOCK.PUB Usage Scenarios
Scenario 1: Company Distributing an Assignment
- HR creates a secret memo on LOCK.PUB with assignment details and submission instructions
- Sets a password and 72-hour expiration
- Sends the link via email
- Delivers the password via phone or text message
- Assignment auto-expires after 72 hours
Scenario 2: Candidate Submitting an Assignment
- Candidate uploads code to a private GitHub repository
- Creates a secret memo with the repo URL and access instructions
- Sets a password and 7-day expiration
- Sends the link and password to the interviewer
- Revokes repository access after the interview concludes
Scenario 3: Company Sharing Access Credentials
When providing dev environment credentials or test accounts to a candidate.
- Write server URL, account, and password in a secret memo
- Set expiration equal to the assignment period
- Deactivate the test account after the interview
Best Practices for Both Sides
For Companies
- Rotate assignments regularly (at least quarterly)
- Include unique identifiers per candidate
- State NDA requirements clearly in the assignment
- Distribute via tools with expiration features
- Revoke access after evaluation is complete
For Candidates
- Never post interview assignments to public repositories
- If you signed an NDA, comply with it strictly
- Limit the access period when submitting
- Deactivate shared links after the interview ends
- Confirm who owns the intellectual property of the submission
The Future of Interview Assignments
As leak problems grow, many companies are exploring alternatives.
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Live coding | Real-time evaluation, impossible to leak | Stressful environment, limited scope |
| Time-limited assignment | Minimizes leak window | Time pressure |
| Pair programming | Closest to real work | Requires interviewer time |
| Password-protected distribution | Easy to implement | Requires password sharing |
Wrapping Up
Interview assignment leaks hurt both companies and candidates. Companies cannot evaluate fairly, and diligent candidates are disadvantaged. Using password protection and expiration features can significantly improve assignment security.
Start managing your interview assignments securely with a secret memo today.
Keywords
Create your password-protected link now
Share information securely for free. No registration required.
Get Started Free